<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kabler cracks me up</title>
	<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up</link>
	<description>Commentary by Vic Sprouse</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: frustrated</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19092</link>
		<dc:creator>frustrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19092</guid>
		<description>why AREN'T the journalists in this state pointing this out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why AREN&#8217;T the journalists in this state pointing this out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frustrated</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19091</link>
		<dc:creator>frustrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19091</guid>
		<description>Why are paid lobbyists allowed to serve on state-agency and publicly paid boards? Isn't this a conflict of interest? This is the underlying problem that no one seems to address. It's like the fox guarding the hen house and the public should demand that this practice be discontinued. Why are the journalists in this state pointing this out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are paid lobbyists allowed to serve on state-agency and publicly paid boards? Isn&#8217;t this a conflict of interest? This is the underlying problem that no one seems to address. It&#8217;s like the fox guarding the hen house and the public should demand that this practice be discontinued. Why are the journalists in this state pointing this out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Mooreq</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19074</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Mooreq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19074</guid>
		<description>I don't know the whole story about Romas Prezioso slapping around Nelson Robinson but lets just say that he has needed slapping for a long time.  He operates just inside the law but some day he will get his due and slip up and hopeful will be a lobbist for the state or federal prison system from inside not outside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know the whole story about Romas Prezioso slapping around Nelson Robinson but lets just say that he has needed slapping for a long time.  He operates just inside the law but some day he will get his due and slip up and hopeful will be a lobbist for the state or federal prison system from inside not outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking for an honest journalist</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19068</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking for an honest journalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/kabler-cracks-me-up#comment-19068</guid>
		<description>In addition to the above account, I recall hearing on radio an interview Hoppy Kerchaval conducted a couple of days ago with Senator Roman Prezioso, in which it was pointed out Kabler quoted a lobbyist but didn't interview Prezioso about the same event   (lobbyist bumping into an elected official). Kabler seems to specialize in quoting one side of a dispute and ignoring the other. Another example is his treatment of past-Delegate Frich. Is that his newspaper's policy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the above account, I recall hearing on radio an interview Hoppy Kerchaval conducted a couple of days ago with Senator Roman Prezioso, in which it was pointed out Kabler quoted a lobbyist but didn&#8217;t interview Prezioso about the same event   (lobbyist bumping into an elected official). Kabler seems to specialize in quoting one side of a dispute and ignoring the other. Another example is his treatment of past-Delegate Frich. Is that his newspaper&#8217;s policy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
