<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More legislative endorsements for Greear</title>
	<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear</link>
	<description>Commentary by Vic Sprouse</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19708</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19708</guid>
		<description>After state soverignty was destroyed by one Big Federal state, the ideals of independent voices was squelched out.

Since 1965 We've had one party with two divisions...Republican and Democrat.

There are no second parties in America.  Two divisions that have MINOR agreements.

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17
"To exercise exclusive Legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings;" 


The federal government has no jurisdiciton outside of 10 miles called D.C. except in federal buildings, federal dockyards, etc. in the independent states.  Outside of this they have NO AUTHORITY in the states soverign decision making.

The two MAJOR parties are really just ONE.  They are in total agreement on the big issues, but disagree on MINOR issues such as abortion, gay rights, etc.

The voters of these 2 parties are fooled into believing that these minor issues are really Major differences.

The major issue is recognizing that this state is really a soveriegn country, just like Kentucky is a soveriegn country(state) and so forth.  Independent of the federal government whose jurisdiction is limited to D.C.  But the two major parties have sold their soverignty of MONEY.  Just like the seat belt law, we took the money and said "okay we'll do what you Feds want as long as we get $$$$"  We sold our soverignty, we've done this time and time again, now we've created a SUPER STATE called AMERICA and it is now haunting us with our uneducated presidential candidates; thus we will now have COMMUNISM and FACISM in the next four years....unless we can still get RON PAUL as our next president.  He knows the constitution.

So the talk of this nominee is a waste of time, because if the democrat gets in, its all the same except a couple minor issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After state soverignty was destroyed by one Big Federal state, the ideals of independent voices was squelched out.</p>
<p>Since 1965 We&#8217;ve had one party with two divisions&#8230;Republican and Democrat.</p>
<p>There are no second parties in America.  Two divisions that have MINOR agreements.</p>
<p>Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17<br />
&#8220;To exercise exclusive Legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings;&#8221; </p>
<p>The federal government has no jurisdiciton outside of 10 miles called D.C. except in federal buildings, federal dockyards, etc. in the independent states.  Outside of this they have NO AUTHORITY in the states soverign decision making.</p>
<p>The two MAJOR parties are really just ONE.  They are in total agreement on the big issues, but disagree on MINOR issues such as abortion, gay rights, etc.</p>
<p>The voters of these 2 parties are fooled into believing that these minor issues are really Major differences.</p>
<p>The major issue is recognizing that this state is really a soveriegn country, just like Kentucky is a soveriegn country(state) and so forth.  Independent of the federal government whose jurisdiction is limited to D.C.  But the two major parties have sold their soverignty of MONEY.  Just like the seat belt law, we took the money and said &#8220;okay we&#8217;ll do what you Feds want as long as we get $$$$&#8221;  We sold our soverignty, we&#8217;ve done this time and time again, now we&#8217;ve created a SUPER STATE called AMERICA and it is now haunting us with our uneducated presidential candidates; thus we will now have COMMUNISM and FACISM in the next four years&#8230;.unless we can still get RON PAUL as our next president.  He knows the constitution.</p>
<p>So the talk of this nominee is a waste of time, because if the democrat gets in, its all the same except a couple minor issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent A. Epling</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19615</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent A. Epling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19615</guid>
		<description>Dan will represent the party well in November, and will in all likelihood be the Republican with the best chance of winning statewide office this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan will represent the party well in November, and will in all likelihood be the Republican with the best chance of winning statewide office this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19609</guid>
		<description>Dan Greear is great leader! He is the best choice for West Virginia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Greear is great leader! He is the best choice for West Virginia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19592</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.changewv.com/2008/more-legislative-endorsements-for-greear#comment-19592</guid>
		<description>"Greear believes he will receive endorsements of legislators in both parties."

I am underwhelmed at the thought that the Democrats will also endorse him.  

Who else is running again????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Greear believes he will receive endorsements of legislators in both parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am underwhelmed at the thought that the Democrats will also endorse him.  </p>
<p>Who else is running again????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
